January 30, 2016!?
As I splished and sploshed my way homewards, I came to an
intersection with some sun-in-yer-face.
Hmmm, thought I, could make it difficult for motorists to see all/some
of my three rear lights. So I took a
pastoral detour along a multi-use trail
and past the construction site.
Quite relaxing and enjoyable, old chum, quite
so.
Here is a bicycling bill that may make it to the Nebraska
legislature for a vote sometime this session.
Here is an article about the topic that I spied in our local newspaper.
In response to your questions and concerns, legislators, I
have sent you the following statements:
(to be determined once I finish my snark attack).
To be honest, I don’t really think much about laws when I am
bicycling. I just want to be safe. But I am sure I would be more concerned about
laws if I were involved in a collision.
The current law is not explicit in protecting bicyclists in crosswalks,
but it should be.
Here is an insightful/inciteful analysis by our Senators Brasch & Smith:
Sen. Lydia Brasch of Bancroft said she has seen
bicyclists ride from sidewalks into crosswalks without paying any attention to
motorists. Sen. Jim Smith of Papillion, the committee chairman, said he is
concerned that giving cyclists right-of-way could also give them a “false sense
of security,” when they should try to avoid collisions.
These senators seemed to be hinting that are boldly
speculating that, should this bill pass, the crosswalks would soon become
crammed and congested with inattentive bicyclists with headphones on and dogs
loping lazily behind. Ah, what a
beautiful thought! I would also like it if
the crosswalks were grassed so that I could graze my goat and picnic upon
my travels as well! I would state as
much in my letters, but I think the foot in the door approach might be more
prudent at this juncture.
But, slightly more seriously, yes, Senator Smith, knowing
that I am legally protected will immediately lower my fear of being struck and
perhaps injured or killed by a vehicle wielded with abandon/near impunity/God's will by a texting teen
or a sleepy septuagenarian.
And Senator Brasch, yes, the danger of bicyclists not paying
attention to motorists is nearly as serious as the threat I face daily of mass
shooters unleashing hellish terror upon my cranium and sphincter (I know what
you’re shooting for, you bastards!), which is why I have my concealed carry
permit securely stashed next to my respirator in my survival bag securely
stowed in my voluminous Nashbar pannier.
Senator McCoy stated that he didn’t think
it was necessary to remove the stipulation that bicyclers must use a multi-use
path when it is available and, “Stay out of the damn street!”
“How would this make bicycling safer?” he querulously
queried!
Well, Senator McCoy, it’s because multi-use trails are
frequently icy and/or mud-covered and can be dangerous. Believe me, Beau, this does happen (I would
supply photographs, but it’s been cool to cold and icy and I’ve just been
concentrating on getting safely from A to B).
It’s not so bad when the mud is frozen like a delicious mudslide, but when
it’s really liquidy and several inches thick, it can be a tad dicey, albeit
fun. The icy part I’m just not too crazy
about. It if for this very reason that I've recently modified my usual route to and from my place of working to include some more street bicycling in order
to avoid the icy permafrost coating the multi-use trail like a lobbyist’s money
lining the campaign contribution-containing pockets of our elected
officials. That shit is slick!
So, to conclude, thank you senators for your time and concerns. I’ll be sure to get a nicey-nice letter
together to illustrate my concerns in a manner that I hope you will address
with less snark and more smart than my initial attempt!
Let’s all go for a ride next time you’re in town senators! Or maybe play a game of Senet.
No comments:
Post a Comment